July 20, 2005

Opinion:

What is right for the nation?

    By Jack Grant

In a recent post, I stated that President George W. Bush has not been showing leadership but instead has been playing politics at the expense of doing what is right for the nation, but he has an opportunity to do so by turning away from short-term political gain at any cost towards doing what is right for the nation, even if there is a political price to be paid.

The Democratic Party now has a similar opportunity to turn away from short-term political gain at any cost towards doing what is right for the nation.

No one in their right mind should have expected President Bush to nominate anyone less conservative than Judge John Roberts, and the Democrats in the Senate should recognize that unless Judge Roberts has committed some crime in the time since he was confirmed as a judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, he should be confirmed for the United States Supreme Court.

Will this change the "balance" of the Supreme Court?

Yes...

But ANY nomination would change that "balance", it is unrealistic to think that President Bush would nominate someone that would not reflect his often-stated views.

This is different than the nomination of John Bolton for United States Ambassador to the United Nations. I did not like the nomination of Bolton because of the contempt he had expressed towards that organization, along with the questionable behaviors he displayed towards matters of national security and accurate versus expedient intelligence in his prior career. Also, someone who mistreats subordinates has issues of character that I do not want in a person filling any diplomatic position, a job which is to advance the cause of my nation, not to ride roughshod over people at will.

It is difficult to perceive the nomination of someone who had made the statements Bolton had made regarding the UN to be perceived as anything other than Bush showing an upraised middle finger to the rest of the world. That is damaging to the interests of the United States and is NOT what is right for our nation.

Since Judge Roberts was found suitable for the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, unless something has changed in the last two years, there should be no issue with him becoming a Supreme Court Associate Justice, regardless of his views on particular cases.

The Democrats in the Senate need to show leadership in this matter and not present obstructionist tactics for some self-perceived short-term political gain. They need to do what is right for the nation, expeditiously move forward on the nomination, ask appropriate questions (not softballs, but not idiotic unanswerable questions), and vote on the nomination based upon the qualifications of the nominee.

If the Democratic Party wants to nominate judges, they need to win back the Presidency by presenting true leaders, not idiots like John Kerry.


Technorati Tags: ,

Posted by Jack Grant at 19:50 on 20 July 2005 Trackbacks (0) | permalink

Comments

You are right, of course. I guess nobody will know exactly what kind of judge he will be until he takes the position. We can speculate, but even Sandra Day O'Connor surprised. I am hoping he will too...

Posted by: Boudicca at July 20, 2005 08:41 PM

Extremely well said, Jack.

I hope the message resonates, it's a damn good one.

Posted by: Chrissy at July 20, 2005 08:54 PM

Although I agree with you 98 percent, its that 2 percent that niggles. We are going to have to live with whoever site with the Supremes for a long long time. This guy is 49. His record, or what I can find of it has gone both ways on the environment and Roe-Wade. Same for civil rights. This past Friday he made a lousy decision as far as I'm concerned about enemy combatants. But, I know he will get placed. MY fear is who who be chosen for Rehnquists spot. I have a bunch of data on my site I have been collectly since O'Connor retired on him if you want some facts. Which is about all I am willing to post at this point -ofcourse, there are a couple of mini-remarks here and there.

But, since the next nomination is more problematic: I nominate Jack for a dual position as Ambassador to the UN and SCOTUS! Do I hear a second?

Posted by: Sinequanon at July 21, 2005 03:37 AM
Post a comment (NOTE: All comments are moderated and must be approved before being displayed)









Remember personal info?


































































































































































































































































































































































This is an individual entry
if you want the main page
click below:


email me at:


Random Fate - latest posts


We don't handle randomness well.
   -Dr. Lucy Jones



Trying to hold the center in not so quiet desperation while the left and the right do their damnest to tear everything apart.


What Others Say
An American transplanted to France for the moment, Jack is sometimes conservative, sometimes liberal, and almost always right.
   -Pennywit

Jack has an impressive knowledge of history, politics, and Keanu Reeves. When it comes to pirates, Jack is waaay sexier than that pansy Dread Pirate Roberts. Oh, wait--I'm thinking of Jack Sparrow...
   -Jennifer (Jennifer's History and Stuff)


Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the center cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
   -William Butler Yeats, January 1919


Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.
   -Dandemis


Wahabism Delenda Est
Wahabism must be destroyed.
-John Donovan, 12 May 2004