May 05, 2005

Opinion: , Some Thoughts:

...on the theory of evolution

    By Jack Grant

It's as much a FACT as our THEORY of gravity.

Unless you don't believe in that one, either...

As I wrote to someone who commented to a previous post, "I wish this were satire...":

Actually, we have a better understanding of evolution than we do of gravity. Gravity is the only one of the four fundamental forces we have not been able to unify together in the elusive "Theory of Everything", the electromagnetic force, and the nuclear/atomic strong and weak forces have all been unified, but gravity refuses to cooperate on that.

Saying "creation science" is on the same level as the theory of evolution is calling something "science" that is inherently unprovable. Science is all about proving or disproving hypothoses using the available evidence, and seeking out new evidence by defining and performing experiments. "Creation science" is religion, not science, and using the word "science" to make it an acceptable alternative to a widely accepted scientific theory is simply an attempt at framing the argument using Orwellian newspeak.

Neither evolution nor any other widely accepted scientific theory that I am aware of deny the possible existence of a God or gods. However, that should be kept in the arena of faith, and out of the public schools, unless you want a special, comparative religion class taught that gives ALL religions equal time and equal weight. Just don't call it "science" because it is not.


We are "forced to regurgitate" LOTS of things we may not necessarily believe, OUR ENTIRE LIVES.

I thought my English literature teacher was full of shit, but I still had to regurgitate what she wanted.

Where are our evangelical saviors on that issue?

Be realistic.

Regarding "theories" versus "laws" versus whatever else, let me explain a little recognized fact. Newton's Laws of Motion are WRONG. They are merely approximations that have since been corrected by Einstein's THEORY of Relativity. In other words, something we still call a set of natural "laws" are not entirely correct, and instead are a special case of a more fundamental set of rules (aka equations).

So, don't get caught up on the "theory" label. Evolution is MORE of a fact than many so-called "laws" that are not in dispute.

Unless of course, we are going to say all of science is full of shit.

Then throw your computer out the window, tell your diabetic friends to not take that new insulin substitute that can be taken by a nasal inhaler that was made by genetically engineering some bacteria, and stop eating anything you don't grow yourself, because we now have genetically modified foods in EVERYTHING, even Doritos.

Science works, and our lives are better for it.

I resent being told that "creationism" is a "science" when the BASIS of science is to make hypotheses that are provable or disprovable. "Creationism" and "God" are NOT provable NOR disprovable and BY DEFINITION do NOT belong in a science class.

In other words, Church and State SHOULD BE SEPARATE, and GOD should NOT be in science class.

Science does not deny the existence of a God or gods. It merely tries to explain how the universe works. God can be present or absent.

However, God should NOT be discussed in a science class, or it BECOMES a religious class, and THERE is your defying of separation of Church and State.

One final warning, our idiocy on this matter endangers the future of our nation, for the greatest existential threat to the future of the United States is not Islamist terrorism (which coincidentally uses religious faith to enforce a discipline on its followers) but China.

The United States was not always pre-eminent in science and technology, and we are in serious danger of losing what lead we have left.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by Jack Grant at 23:47 on 5 May 2005
Comments

Ah, I figured I'd find you here when the emails stopped. ;)

I don't know about the other crazies afflicted with a Faith, but I don't think Creationism is a science.

It is an explanation for the origin, and the one I'm going with. For the most part, things taught in science class do not in any way contradict this fundamental belief.

But there are some areas that DO contradict. If a teacher is going tell my child that the earth is definitely, without a doubt, 4.5 billion years old, then he or she might as well tell her, "Your mommy lied to you, honey."

What's wrong with, "Most scientists believe that the earth is around 4.5 billion years old, though some scientists believe that it is less than ten thousand years old. Let's study a debate on the matter..."

Creationism/God need NEVER be mentioned; I only resent that our beliefs must be not only contradicted, but belittled, particularly when there are well-educated, well-researched scientists who -although in the minority- support these figures.

Having said that, I will also say this... Some battles aren't worth the fight, and I think this is one of them. Though I'll readily share my opinion, I wouldn't raise a judicial level stink over an issue that encompasses such a small percentage of my child's learning experience. After all, I ain't gonna shut off the Discovery channel, because I appreciate the fact that she watches and learns from it.

When she gets older, she can decide whether she wants to believe billions or thousands.

Posted by: Key at May 6, 2005 12:20 AM

I don't know of any reputable scientists who believe that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.

Again, that is a matter of faith, because the preponderance of evidence indicates the planet is between 3 billion and 8 billion years old.

If a teacher says, "You're mommy lied to you" then the teacher is out of line and should be called on it.

List for me the well-researched scientists you refer to who support the "less than 10,000 years old" theory.

Posted by: Jack at May 6, 2005 12:25 AM

Ok, Brainy Butt. Debating you is exhausting, you know that? ;) Give me a couple of days...

Posted by: Key at May 6, 2005 01:02 AM




























































































































































































































































































































































This is an individual entry
if you want the main page
click below:


email me at:


Random Fate - latest posts


We don't handle randomness well.
   -Dr. Lucy Jones



Trying to hold the center in not so quiet desperation while the left and the right do their damnest to tear everything apart.


What Others Say
An American transplanted to France for the moment, Jack is sometimes conservative, sometimes liberal, and almost always right.
   -Pennywit

Jack has an impressive knowledge of history, politics, and Keanu Reeves. When it comes to pirates, Jack is waaay sexier than that pansy Dread Pirate Roberts. Oh, wait--I'm thinking of Jack Sparrow...
   -Jennifer (Jennifer's History and Stuff)


Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the center cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
   -William Butler Yeats, January 1919


Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.
   -Dandemis


Wahabism Delenda Est
Wahabism must be destroyed.
-John Donovan, 12 May 2004