September 17, 2004
Opinion:
Let's score cheap points instead of policing our own
By Jack GrantI was going to write a post about the recent incident that resulted in a photo of a little girl sitting on her father's shoulders, crying because of the "meanie Kerry supporters" surrounding her who tore up a Bush-Cheney sign. John of Argghhh! had a post on this incident today, and I could not restrain myself from commenting. I'm not trying to pick on John in particular here, but unfortunately, his post is when the straw hit the back of my camel. Here is the comment I left:
John, I have big issues with a father taking his little girl to an event where he will deliberately provoke a reaction. BOTH sides are guilty of behaving badly. Recall my post on how protesters who made it into the Republican convention were kicked by someone while being held down by security with a link to the video? The post is here:http://www.randomfate.net/RF-new/archives/001065.html
(note: original link from The Moderate Voice)
Note that the person being kicked is a woman, and the kicker can be assumed to be a Republican and a Bush supporter. In my mind, even if the protester was "asking for it", kicking is out of line and far worse than what is described as "mugging a little girl" who's father placed her in a position where he should have known that at the least there would be shouting. I don't know of many little girls that wouldn't cry when shouting is directed towards their father.
So... looks to me that the "family values" party has men who don't value their families enough to keep their little girls out of bad and potentially violent situations, and the right-wingers who are calling for civility here never complained about the woman being kicked during the Republican convention.
Yes, this has pissed me off, because BOTH sides are behaving badly, and NEITHER side is policing themselves, instead they are trying to score cheap points every time something stupid like this happens.
I cannot believe that those leaning towards the right-wing side of the spectrum have not taken this father to task for risking his little girl. I cannot believe that this photo of a little girl crying means more to those leaning towards the right-wing than one of their own kicking a protester while that protester is being held down. Tearing up a sign is one thing, physical assault is quite another. Does this mean it's OK as long as it's being done by a Bush supporter, but not OK when being done by a Kerry supporter?
I'm tired of the self-righteous attitude I see on BOTH sides ever time something like this happens. "They are evil because some of them behaved badly!!! We would NEVER, EVER act like that!" when BOTH sides HAVE acted JUST LIKE THAT. Instead of scoring points when your opponents behave badly, why don't you devote even 10% of your outrage towards your OWN who behave badly?
UPDATE: John pointed out that what I wrote above could be interpreted by those who choose to do so that I am defending the bad behavior of the Kerry supporters using the "well they deserved it" defense. I am NOT defending the behavior at all, I find it absolutely despicable. However, despicable behavior is being shown by BOTH sides, but NEITHER side devotes even 10% of their outrage at bad behavior towards those who are on "their side". I challenge those listed in John's post to take their own to task for behaving badly, starting with describing how a Bush supporter kicking a protester who is being held down is unacceptable behavior no matter which candidate that protester supports or which candidate the person performing the assault supports.
Allah (John's link didn't go to that photo, I'll have to search for it)
Travelling Shoes (sic)
UPDATE 2: There are others out there who are condemning ALL bad behavior, or who are wondering what the father in this case was trying to accomplish by exposing his child to a potentially bad situation:
UPDATE 3: Was this incident staged? There is at least one assertion that it was. It will be interesting to see if the fact-check brigade will dog-pile on this as much as on the CBS forged memos story.
UPDATE 4: I haven't seen any evidence that the incident was deliberately staged to the extent asserted by the Rising Hegemon. This assertion was that Phil Parlock, the father in the photo, had one of his sons tear up the sign for the purposes of the photo. Given that there has been bad behavior from BOTH Democrats and Republicans, this is likely yet another example of idiots behaving like spoiled children and choosing to not suppress their impulses. This behavior is completely unacceptable no matter who engages in it.
I don't cut Parlock any slack in this either, however. This man has a track record of inciting incidents at Democrat-sponsored events (see the Rising Hegemon post for links). I am not saying at all that his daughter deserved to be frightened, but Parlock is in contention for "worst father of the year" because I believe he knew that something would happen. He is being extremely disingenuous when he says, "I am completely overwhelmed. I had no idea. We don’t go for the press. We go for the message." With his history, he did indeed have an "idea," and if he didn't, he's too stupid to deserve to have children.
Posted by Jack Grant at 16:25 on 17 September 2004Jack, you've found your niche... blogger net-nanny... 8^D
I did take good 'ol Dad to task. But Dad's behavior isn't the point. It's a separate issue, which I'll let you run with, since you got the head-start!
I dedicated over 10% of my words to the father, I'll slap around right-wingers when I notice it (sorry if I'm not spending my entire life on line policing the behavior of the moonbats ((and no, that isn't a stab at you, Jack))).
But you are sailing perilously close to a "she was a tease, she deserved it" date rape defense of the asshat. No, I don't think that's your point, but it can be read that way...
And you need to make these points in the comments of bigger bloggers than me so you can get your point out to more people!
Of course, don't abandon me. You keep the comments interesting!
Posted by: John of Argghhh! at September 17, 2004 04:40 PMAgreed, it could be read as the "deserved it" defense if one is predisposed to read it that way. I was planning to take Oliver Willis to task on his interpretations of some recent remarks by Dick Cheney because the lenses he uses to view the world seem to be even more distorted than the usual bias I see everywhere.
I'll post a challenge to those "bigger bloggers" to get my point out.
Posted by: Jack at September 17, 2004 05:12 PMJohn -
Just wanted to say that I agree with your assessment 100%, based on the perceived facts of the situation.
If the incident was "staged" then that would of course change my position, and in any case the particular Bush support, Mr. Parlock, deserves some scrutiny for having made the news for similar stories in both the 1996 and 2000 campaigns.
Glad I found this blog. I feel so disenfranchised these days that I find myself actually being driven further left than I'm normally comfortable being. I need a voice of reason!
Posted by: Al at September 17, 2004 07:47 PMVideo of the protester being kicked is not at that link. I've never seen it, so I have no idea what it contains.
Posted by: RePublius at September 18, 2004 03:15 AMYup. Quite frankly BOTH sides are getting out of hand. I can't be at support/protest rallies due to my job... but if I could, I'd probably carry an extra sign that says "I'M WITH STUPID" and stand with whoever I oppose for a photo-op. :0)
Posted by: -=e=- at September 19, 2004 02:08 AM





