<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The descent of &#8220;discussion&#8221; and &#8220;debate&#8221; into &#8220;screaming past each other&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/</link>
	<description>One more roll of the dice...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/MT/?p=1595#comment-2527</guid>
		<description>There you go again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tas</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>tas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 03:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/MT/?p=1595#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>Calling somebody on their use of profanity is usually the mark of someone who doesn't actually have a point.

As for running from an argument, I don't care what you call it.  You'll call it whatever the fuck you want, anyways; at least where I'm concerned.  Boyd came right out and said that since the views were voiced by me, that makes them invalid.  So if that's the "argument" which you support, then more power to you. 

However, in the world of non-make believe, "arguments" like that don't wash.  Arguments on points of the matter do.  And as far as I'm concerned, the right hasn't provided any of those -- They've simply gotten angry with me and resorted to slander, character defamation, and outright lying. 

So if somebody wants to argue me on points, fine.  But fuck this bullshit.  If that's what you call an "argument", then you've got yourself a lot of fucking learning to do, Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling somebody on their use of profanity is usually the mark of someone who doesn&#8217;t actually have a point.</p>
<p>As for running from an argument, I don&#8217;t care what you call it.  You&#8217;ll call it whatever the fuck you want, anyways; at least where I&#8217;m concerned.  Boyd came right out and said that since the views were voiced by me, that makes them invalid.  So if that&#8217;s the &#8220;argument&#8221; which you support, then more power to you. </p>
<p>However, in the world of non-make believe, &#8220;arguments&#8221; like that don&#8217;t wash.  Arguments on points of the matter do.  And as far as I&#8217;m concerned, the right hasn&#8217;t provided any of those &#8212; They&#8217;ve simply gotten angry with me and resorted to slander, character defamation, and outright lying. </p>
<p>So if somebody wants to argue me on points, fine.  But fuck this bullshit.  If that&#8217;s what you call an &#8220;argument&#8221;, then you&#8217;ve got yourself a lot of fucking learning to do, Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/#comment-2515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/MT/?p=1595#comment-2515</guid>
		<description>Tas is projecting - again. He is the one who has to win at all costs. The last argument of the incompetent is to throw a fit and run away.

The profanity is essential: It's all he's got left. That's all the left has got.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tas is projecting - again. He is the one who has to win at all costs. The last argument of the incompetent is to throw a fit and run away.</p>
<p>The profanity is essential: It&#8217;s all he&#8217;s got left. That&#8217;s all the left has got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jae grenier</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>jae grenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/MT/?p=1595#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>The problem is that freedom of speech has descended into freedom of SCREECH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that freedom of speech has descended into freedom of SCREECH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob J Young</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob J Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/MT/?p=1595#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>Well, I prefer to use the term â€ścyber bulliesâ€? rather than â€śfucking assholesâ€?.  I've had some discussions in the past with people like that.  If someone refuses to acknowledge that a point you made is valid, are you really having a discussion?  One sure way to smoke out a cyber-bully is to say, â€śI don't think thats true. Can we just agree that our perspectives are different?â€?  If they just keep going then you know their mind is closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I prefer to use the term â€ścyber bulliesâ€? rather than â€śfucking assholesâ€?.  I&#8217;ve had some discussions in the past with people like that.  If someone refuses to acknowledge that a point you made is valid, are you really having a discussion?  One sure way to smoke out a cyber-bully is to say, â€śI don&#8217;t think thats true. Can we just agree that our perspectives are different?â€?  If they just keep going then you know their mind is closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bou</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/10/23/the-descent-of-discussion-and-debate-into-screaming-past-each-other/#comment-2507</link>
		<dc:creator>Bou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/MT/?p=1595#comment-2507</guid>
		<description>There are assholes on both sides of the political spectrum.  This is why I can't do a political blog.  I can't take the assholes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are assholes on both sides of the political spectrum.  This is why I can&#8217;t do a political blog.  I can&#8217;t take the assholes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
