<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreign Ground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/06/30/foreign-ground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/06/30/foreign-ground/</link>
	<description>One more roll of the dice...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kerlyssa</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/06/30/foreign-ground/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerlyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/WP/2005/06/30/foreign-ground/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>I dunno. Why do those pesky black folks keep defining themselves by their melanin content? It isn't like it's important or anything. Why do those women keep defining themselves by that one chromosome? It's just one.

Would the separation disappear if homosexuals stopped thinking about it? Does discrimination only occur when it is named by the victim?

Is it inevitable that a person can only see themselves, and perhaps those almost exactly like themselves, as true people? And the rest are cariactures no different than the light and sound of a movie screen?

Is a 'positive' stereotype really the best outcome you can see?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. Why do those pesky black folks keep defining themselves by their melanin content? It isn&#8217;t like it&#8217;s important or anything. Why do those women keep defining themselves by that one chromosome? It&#8217;s just one.</p>
<p>Would the separation disappear if homosexuals stopped thinking about it? Does discrimination only occur when it is named by the victim?</p>
<p>Is it inevitable that a person can only see themselves, and perhaps those almost exactly like themselves, as true people? And the rest are cariactures no different than the light and sound of a movie screen?</p>
<p>Is a &#8216;positive&#8217; stereotype really the best outcome you can see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinequanon</title>
		<link>http://www.randomfate.net/MT/2005/06/30/foreign-ground/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinequanon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomfate.net/WP/2005/06/30/foreign-ground/#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>You should check out the new study on bisexuals....  sheesh .. they take 100 men and call most bisexual males in the group gay based on evidence of watching men-men or men-women fliks...(New York Post today)

Really an odd study if you ask me... and, certainly not conclusive...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should check out the new study on bisexuals&#8230;.  sheesh .. they take 100 men and call most bisexual males in the group gay based on evidence of watching men-men or men-women fliks&#8230;(New York Post today)</p>
<p>Really an odd study if you ask me&#8230; and, certainly not conclusive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
